Equity is fair?

Justice and injustice.

ethical philosophy

Between the rich and the poor, between the strong and the weak, it is the freedom which oppresses and the law that liberates . Father Lacordaire.

The general evolution of our species, all men are fundamentally equal. The difference in treatment between individuals, would be fundamentally unfair.

But to build humanity, some injustice is required. it must indeed be various rewards for various activities. However, this is beyond the scope of injustice tolerable, it is the gap between low and high rewards rewards. This legal abuse often uses the concept of fairness to justify .

succinct definition

So here we are at the foot of two main concepts used by humanity to evolve : fairness and equality. At first glance, equity is what humanity lives and equality is what it is . Equity is the workhorse of liberalism, equal that of Marxism . Equity is rooted in the functioning of natural primates. Equality is a human novelty .

Towards a fairer world

Just politics, just fairness

Trade, industry with fairness

We did not capitalize on the cooperation of others without due consideration . The two principles of justice define what fair compensation in the case of institutions of the basic structure. Thus, if the system is right, everyone will get a fair return on the condition that everyone (including himself ) cooperates . Rawls, A Theory of Justice

The current liberal system offers " to each according to his merit ."
The natural order imposed " to each according to his position in the hierarchy ."

This is exactly the same only if the dominant co-opt their payment schedule .

A recurring gear

A society without a strong presence of the notion of equality, leads invariably the same mechanisms. A group of dominant manages to decide the value of each and hoard all the privileges .

The equitable societies

It is however possible to access functions perfectly fair .
For this, the major disciplines of society (justice, education, health, media, politics) must be egalitarian. They must place, rich and poor, strong and weak, on the same level playing field. In this case, we can speak of a truly just and humane society * .

* This was the case with the French company for 30 glorious . She was oriented in this trend. Its great foundations were in public hands . Since then, they have been attacked by the private sector.

Politics, law, education with equal

For me, the human phenomenon, uses two distinct kinds of activities. On the one hand the specialties available to trading systems, and on the other, those who should it be banned.

• Areas open markets (trade, industry, etc.). Use equity to improve their performance .
• Prohibited disciplines ( education, justice, politics, medicine, etc.). Relies on equality and justice for improvement.
  

Professors, judges, politicians, doctors, journalists must be aware of this requirement . Their mission is to offer the same opportunities and the same rights to everyone. These disciplines must remain rebellious to the authority of the market.

Find the reason

Belong to one of these trades requires the desire to equal the main light . The defection of this landmark show, in my opinion the current loss of consciousness. This is a drop of interest in deep ethical these vocations . It is the school responsible for the formation of these corporations, to exalt the transcendent value . The company must therefore not allow the market to gradually take over these disciplines.

Aristotle

Éthique à Nicomaque

It is now necessary to address equity and equitable, and to see what relationship there is between equity and justice between what is fair and what is right . Because we find, considering them carefully, it is not quite one and the same, and they are not different kinds .

Sometimes we praise what is fair, and the man who has this quality so that rent for actions other than just we use the word instead of just good, something to the " fairer " than the thing is better .

Sometimes, by cons, to only see the reason, if the fair is something that deviates from the right, it seems strange that gives its approval. Because, finally, they are different, or just is not good, or what is fair, or, if both are good, they are just the same. So about what raises embarrassment about the fair . However, these statements are all correct from a certain point of view, there is nothing contradictory.

The fair, in fact, while above a certain kind of justice is itself just, not as belonging to a different kind that is greater than the right. The fair and equitable are one and the same, and both are good, but fair is the best of both .

What makes it difficult is that fair, although it is fair, is not just comply with the law, but rather is just a legal amendment . This is that all law is universal, and there are cases in which it is not possible to say with perfect justice universally . And therefore, in matters on which it is necessary to make general provisions, although it is not possible to do so with full accuracy, the law embraces what happens most frequently, without concealing the resulting error .

The law is not less flawless, because the error does not come from the law or the legislature, but the very nature of the thing: it's the actions that matter, by itself, is well done. Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Book 5 Chapter 14

Narcissism