☀️
⛅
🐦🐦🐦
revolt and fatalismThe greatest evil, apart from the injustice is that the perpetrator of the injustice does not pay his iniquity. Plato
Given the presence of "evil" often appear paradoxical two attitudes :
1 / The revolt against an event that is considered unfair.
2 / fatalism that grows to accept things as they come. To accept life as it is offered and "evil" as it is.
The revolt can cause reactions such as revenge, vendetta, cruelty inability to forgive, etc. .
Fatalism can lead to resignation. A lack of fighting spirit. At a certain stillness of society.
But the two positions also bring their share of qualities to mankind. If the human group was sufficiently intelligent and efficient, it would use the best of both responses. Separately because each of the two positions is inconsistent with the principles of contemporary democratic humanity.
Pay evil with justice, and kindness with kindness. Lao- Tzu
Some aspects of the revolt, are extremely positive for humanity. Western society such rebels against the evil. This insurrection help improve its legislation, its technology, medicine etc. . By not giving in to fate, the man requires the state to fight against injustice. The great social movements, associations of victims, unions are born of this.
On the negative side, the inability to accept things as they are, are often accompanied by an exaggerated radicalism. This radicalism creates great difficulties to forgive, to understand the motivations of the transgression. It darkens the picture of the culprit, with the risk of making a scapegoat. Finally, it boosts the archaic systems * instead of supporting the education, prevention, education, psychology ...
Some aspects of fatalism, are also positive for humanity. This resignation makes it possible, easier to accept things irreversible * .
It prints the company a kind of placidity, phlegm, of pleasant detachment. Fatalism but also his two bad profiles. In some ways, it hinders the development of society. It prevents reforms. Maintains archaic principles such as caste where the clan. Fatalism helps justify war and violence as a means of development. So it can also lead to accept the unacceptable.
Is there an ideal middle position ?The face of evil, there is of course an intermediate position between fatalism and denial .. A opposed to individual or state vengeance position. A position to accept violence without justice do its duty * .
A position exists for understanding how and why evil occurs. One wants to work on the causes of pain, their mechanisms posture.
Media reinvested in their educational role ... Media can teach the great principles of justice ... Capable of illuminating the real causes of "evil" ... Media wishing to explain to citizens the logic of extenuating circumstances * . Media can promote forgiveness to free humanity from the negative forces.
This would create real structures counseling. To extend to every victim of evil ( and not only during major disasters).
Create a true organization of crime prevention . A conscious organization of the importance of education and values disseminated by the company.
Offer a genuine psychological work, educational and social offenders . Allow them to feel the interest to engage his energy in a positive way . Such a commitment quickly diminish the risk of recurrence ( generator powerful popular sense of injustice ) .
There would be a fight against impunity. Offer in against part of just sanctions, humanistic and educational . Alternative sanctions to prison whenever possible.
And foremost, of course, we should quickly improve detention conditions . Should imagine more human structures . Fully dedicated to the "recovery" structures, rehabilitation . It seems absurd to still send "hard" in even harsher structures. Harder than the hard places that have formed. And give them more, milder offenders in pasture.
We 're not there yet. The ideal treatment of "evil" is far from human practical conditions. The man still needs the bad emotions to live. Hatred, revenge, serve to protect the rights of suffering too intense. And how can it be unfair abuse or murder of a child? The rape of a woman or torture ? Why destiny, life, chooses his victims in a manner apparently so arbitrary ? Why this child, this woman rather than another? Why luck seems to continue on as family, as human group ? Maybe we find some calming key reflecting the idea of right and wrong . As we leaning on the positive contribution of the evil and on the actual liability of the company . The responsibility of the community in the expression of evil. Sometimes in his recovery and recurrence.
La vérité jaillira de l'apparente injustice. Albert Camus
It would be unrealistic to expect to get rid of now the feeling of injustice of humanity. This emotion is one of the powerful engines of human activity .
Consider an example . The big event experienced as an injustice appears to be dead.
Popular common sense tells us " equal" to her face . He's right in that every human being is mortal. And it is true that we do not have to suffer the injustice of living alongside humans immortal . Yet some of us live longer than others. Some die very old, some very young .
Some die a natural death, others violent death, etc. . We can therefore estimate all very unfair.
But that would be a just world face death ? A world where every human being in the North and the South, died at the upper limit of life expectancy *?
And if that were the case, some of us do not they find it unfair gap between men and women ? And even, this shift would be abolished, others do not they deem unjust also to know the year of his death ? do they not say that this is a real torture, real injustice ?
Consider now the feeling of injustice related to death as abolished. Should we have done with a sense of injustice? The man did not find it unfair to be different from its neighbor? Not have the same qualities (although itself benefits of personal qualities ) ? It would then, to abolish all sense of injustice, an absolute likeness of men . A world of clones with exactly the same quality and the same activities. The same feelings, the same destiny and the same lives. Perfect look-alikes living in a world without differences and without suffering. Obviously such a world can not exist . He could create anything, to change anything, expect anything . And even if we would exist, there would still be carrying injustice. Indeed, each clone occupying a unique place in the world, have a unique vision of the world. His point of view would be different, thus capable of activating a sense of injustice.
The sense of injustice is a child of difference and no difference can be no humanity. So injustice seems to be a one-off but fundamental tools to build human society. It is our sense of injustice, our vision of injustice, it is good to change .
Place victim greater than executionerThe world is unfair, if you accept it, you are an accomplice, if you change it, you're executioner. Jean-Paul Sartre
Another cliché often drives the sense of injustice. This is the idea that the executioner would be happier than his victim. The predator prey. The rich happier than the poor . The abuser than the abused ..
If this were the case, the Romans would never have abandoned their "happiness" in the face of enslaved Christians. They never adopted the values they resigned martyred . The emperors had the choice between the omnipotence of the executioner and the humility of the victim. Why they chose to marry the love of valuesand guiding dominated the West in this regard? Why the dominant society of Rome is seduced by the great wave of Christian love? The intimate feeling, the state of mind of the oppressed is simply more attractive than the oppressor.
If there was more blessed to be master slave, slavery would have imposed . If the master was happier than his serfs, serfdom would become the supreme value. But this is not the case . Human consciousness, evolving, converted more and more slavery . She showed them all the disadvantages of dominance. Mental strength it requires. Contempt, disdain, she claims sufficiency . The fear, anxiety, worry, paranoia it requires . Hardness, perversion, fear and remorse incurred this omnipotence. If the perpetrators were happier than their victims, selfishness plastronnerait . It paraderait, proud of him, watching with delight its damage . But slowly the opposite is needed.
In humanity, good triumphs over evil gradually . The sweetness on the strength, intelligence on the drive. Consciousness of unconsciousness. Opposing desires of Friedrich Nietzsche, the spiritual is not the warrior. And so, hitting bumpers philosophers and spiritual reverse the demands of nature . The Socrates, the St. Augustine, the Thoreau where Martin Luther King, gradually illuminate the absurdity of the rule. Unhealthy pleasures of abuse of others, give way to the happiness of clear and fair-minded .
They are not resistant to many of the major rivers of human evolution . Only a few pathological cases gloat know their selfishness and their instinct of domination. Most people regret the harm they do to others. They apologize quickly when, unwittingly, they mistreat a fellow .
We are a sentimental crowd, steeped in ideal, to use the beautiful song by Alain Souchon . Of course, our neuroses and system values sometimes lead us to envy narcissistic postures. To desire the ease of a thug boss, the indifference of a mafia boss, lack of love a porn actor . They clapped, they flatter, increasing suddenly their narcissism and sense of omnipotence * .
But the human majority, in fact, do not exchange places . Few sensitive to venture into these insensitive and discriminating lives. If they survive there, he returned one day or another to their true nature.
Human majority has a state of brotherly spirit, generous and friendly. It is open to the world and respectful of others. Only a small minority of us can act coldly executioner. Only a minority manages to despise others enough to make an object in his service. The gentleman in generosity, brotherhood and respect for others, is unhappy in these roles. Who would like to experience life as a torturer or a slave ? Who would like to live in a state of narcissistic mind regarding women as objects? Foreigners as slaves? Poor with disdain ? Their employees with arrogance ? Workers with contempt? Meadows that would give kindness to don the garb of "evil "?
The position of executioner is lower than that of victim. If it was the opposite, the collaborationist during World War II, would have involved a human majority. This was not the case . Only a tiny minority of the French population are yielded.
The term " quisling " is due to Marcel Deat, in The Work of 4 November 1940. Collaborationism not only to practice together, but to encourage, promote it, to make it a political issue . It is the fact of political parties and the collaborationist press. Yet these conspicuous servants of the enemy did not hesitate to qualify as "national" . The Germans themselves, who do not take them seriously, especially used them to increase their pressure on the Vichy government . The " collaborators" are only a handful of isolated men and despised by the mass of the country ( about 2% of the population) Source Wikipedia.
The man wants to be good. Sometimes the hierarchy requires him otherwise. Humanity must now look at this face . Collaborationism impliqua not actually a minority of French .
Only a few individuals at the head of the state, ordered the worst to their peers. Of the 76,000 Jews deported from France, 40% were arrested by the French police. Humanity needs to reflect this. Man must learn to disobey unjust orders. This statement should be a separate subject of education.
the values of the society at the heart of the problemWhat most terrible scourge of injustice that has weapons in hand. Aristotle
"Evil," we said, sometimes gives to feel like a real injustice. This is the case for example, when an innocent victim crosses paths with a psychopath. You can actually add it to the account of injustice. It can also alleviate this feeling by illuminating the undeniable responsibility system . Although chance or destiny plays a role in our encounter with the "evil" . But the company also has a large share of responsibility. Just analyze the existence of a serial killer, to determine the negligence of the community. Most of the time, these passages in Acts, are preceded by a considerable number of warning signs .
But of course, before the time is not the time and with "if", we would put Paris in a bottle . We have made tremendous progress, but there is still much to do. We begin to detect very early childhood trauma and the treatment. We know detect emotional deprivation . Deficiencies empathetic . Narcissistic exaggerations, and we slowly learn to repair . We are also beginning to take seriously the first cruel or violent acts. to decipher the level of dangerousness of certain individuals ... etc. . ( A prime example )
2001
Tu supportes des injustices ; console-toi, le vrai malheur est d'en faire. Démocrite
Ce n'est pas une utopie. C'est une trajectoire déjà visible, inscrite dans l'histoire depuis le premier primate. Lentement. Imparfaitement. Mais dans une direction.
☀️ Découvrir le fondement