☀️
⛅
🐦🐦🐦
Mercy, divine virtue itself is inseparable from justice . Henri Rondet
How can we accept the idea of human progress when faced with the phenomenon of evil? How can we accept the positivism of science and technology despite the devastation they induce ? Understanding evil, detect positive contributions, is not justified. We can have compassion for a criminal like his victim, while hoping that the first to be tried and sentenced to up to its fault.
It is always very difficult to speak about the positive contributions of "evil." This broader vision is not yet truly part of our nature . Especially the western side. We can demonstrate a greater understanding towards some transgression, and overload aggression towards those close to us . Only a few people are capable of great compassion able to express their love in all circumstances.
The violence of evil. Understandable revolt against the unspeakable . The desire for revenge. Ease of judging another. The inability to put in place the blame. The need for scapegoats, are still too present in our society. Talk positive about the "evil" could hurt those who have experienced or are still feeling the torment. It is also likely to be misunderstood by many of our peers. These may involve the need to understand, to a lack of empathy or bad Darwinism. The likened to a kind of religious fundamentalism or a morbid fascination for evil. We obviously are in any of these cases.
To make sense of the real we need to understand the true nature of evil. To capture whether or not a human destiny is, we must understand the deep meaning of his presence in our species.
What you 're doing right and wrong, you do so at your Muhammad
Assuming that every action affects the following ( may therefore cause a number of unexpected effects ), any crime, even the most horrible, can be the cause of a quantity of goods .
The most terrible harm, such that often relate the media sometimes create ( beyond the suffering and despair for families it touches ), a real legislative work at the company . The horror comes often persuade men better than consciousness. She managed to put safety locks, restrictive and deterrent laws to prevent other similar crimes from happening . So at the end of its chain, a heinous crime, can eventually provide a substantial benefit to humanity.
The evolution of the worst is obviously inevitable. This is not a definite choice of man. If we really had a choice between inventing our banned before the emergence of evil, or invent after the course of wrongdoing ( the evolution of the law by law ), humanity has chosen the first attitude.
In the area of good and evil, we are still unable to prevent than cure . Yet we have acquired the means to anticipate the worst.
Only the means are still reserved to a few specialized areas of the industry. Areas such as aerospace and pharmaceuticals. The majority of accidents are considered before sending men into space. And a drug is put into service and after being 99% sure its not harmful ) .
During the time he had often achieve excess to rectify . Peaks in evil before a decision of the company to put in place . Conversely, sometimes in wanting to do good deeds eventually cause more harm than we would have liked. Karl Marx, working his doctrine was far from imagining the tyrannical use that arose . He had no idea that one day human beings would use its name and its concepts for a world so far from his intentions and principles .
The crimes of the dictators
In the opposite direction, Hitler and his accomplices were never imagined such an end to their killing spree . They could not imagine having to live a sordid death ... They knew they would be the cause of the devastation of the country they claim to love ... They also did not know that survive their peoples and groups of people were dying to destroy . Importantly, these criminals were unaware that one day mankind would return their ignominy, against the same type of ideology. They did not think their genocide would cause a fundamental law . Legislation to protect the future of such genocide, ie the iCC, International Criminal Court . The first international crimes trial, will the Nazi and Japanese crimes. On 8 August 1945 London Agreement constitute the Nuremberg Tribunal and establish the concepts of crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. In January 1946 will be equivalent, and the court of Tokyo ) . If after Nuremberg, there were other genocides, though some have tried to hide under seasonal justifications of right, it is for several reasons. This is due to the misunderstanding of the meaning of our history. In our inability to understand the exact claim of evil. Enter it requires us across the whole of humanity . And it is also because of our darkness when the sense of humanity to its goal.
Unfortunately, humanity is never really managed to change the law except by law . He often had to go to reach the heights of horror (as was the case with Nazi concentration camps ), to make fundamental decisions . Decisions like to create for the first time in its history, an international tribunal for crimes against humanity.
A quantity of decision and command ordered during the war 14/18 ( as the use of chemical weapons, mustard gas, mass murder ) already deserved to be considered crimes against humanity. The First World War is 9 million dead and about 8 million disabled . But the release of the First World War, no one can ask for legislation to try crimes against humanity. Why ? Simply because all governments share responsibilities in the horrors * decided .
The Herero, while they opposed the German colonization of their territory ( South West Africa ), were these victims of genocide between 1904 and 1911. Of 80,000, the population fell to 15,000 individuals in the genocide . Commanded by General von Trotha, the German army was equipped with rifles, machine guns and even guns. She had received the Emperor William II an extermination order . Wikipedia
This act could be the cause of such an act as a crime against humanity. But humanity, it seems, is not yet not stopped.
2001
Good and evil
Pour moi, je suis à peu près persuadé que, parmi les philosophes, il n'y en a pas un qui pense qu'un homme pèche volontairement et fasse volontairement des actions honteuses et mauvaises ; ils savent tous au contraire que tous ceux qui font des actions honteuses et mauvaises les font involontairement, PLATON Les sophistes.
Ce n'est pas une utopie. C'est une trajectoire déjà visible, inscrite dans l'histoire depuis le premier primate. Lentement. Imparfaitement. Mais dans une direction.
☀️ Découvrir le fondement