Humanist and DarwinianThe philosophy is the art of life difficult trying to convince its simplicity. Frederic Dard (called San Antonio )
Often the virus is judged according to three viewpoints fairly simplistic :
1 / According to the medical point of view , it is an enemy to be defeated. Unnecessary to eradicate without asking more questions murderer about him.
2 / scientific perspective seeks to understand its mechanisms and interactions. It aims to update its technical secrets but always without asking metaphysical questions.
3 / The Darwinian perspective uses its presence to justify its racism. For him, the virus becomes the arm of God ( or nature ). A relentless instrument to remove the weak and the "non- compliant" of humanity. Then it has a purpose: to promote the development of "strong" and "compliant" *.
Of course, these three perspectives are not comparable. The first two have a humanist vocation. Doctors and scientists strive to improve humanity. Social Darwinism is instead motivated by selfishness and discriminating elitism. It is based on the rules of the animal world. A world left by man since long and to which it would be absurd to return. Once past these basic points of view, * we can see a more spiritual sense of the virus.
Indeed, his influence does not stop at the "evil" it entails. This biological entity, also generates "good." It motivates deep and "positive" behavioral changes in humans.
A positive creative energyThe creative principle loves His creatures. In other words, we want the good life ! Let us try to will the good of life.
When no particular emotion , we see life, we can give him some kindness. Even if there is a fight , everything seems organized to mitigate violence and suffering.
Symptoms and strategies are offered to individuals and species. These indices allow them to avoid as much as possible of traps.
The interdependence between human groups is a huge wealth. It multiplies the knowledge and positive activities for all. Following the focused look at life , we can discover his kindness and magnanimity. If the virus was malicious , it was designed so that nothing can limit the damage. This is absolutely not the case.
The obligation of the rich to care for the poor they create.Could it be that something has no meaning in creation?
As man acts with justice , intelligence and humanism to the virus , he manages to turn the influence. Often it is the virus itself that requires humanity to adopt this posture. In the nineteenth century, for example , cholera was rampant among European populations. But its presence has also produced a profound change in society. He forced the rich to care for the poor to preserve its virulence.
He demanded to employers to eradicate slums in which they contained their employees. He pushed the industry to clean up the suburbs of large cities. He was forced to improve hygiene slaves they operated.
Somehow , cholera has forced the "powerful" to overcome their indifference. He reduced them casually and insensitivity with which they maintained men in slums. Willy-nilly , the wealthy classes had to drop a few parts of their selfishness. Apart from a small minority humanists * employers alone would not have had the initiative. The wealthy classes are forced or suffer too, the consequences of virus.
At the time, the rich could they , on their own , beyond their insensitivity towards the poor? Would they have done if it were a matter for them to preserve their own interests? Would they have found the will to clean up neighborhoods by simple generosity ? I do not think so. And just now look at the state of the poor world , to confirm. Overall, the rich world is towards the destitute with the engine of their own selfishness.
The average conscience of what we call "elite " is low. It was much lower than that of the people. This is why humanity gradually chooses democracy. *
Leaders manage to delude using an amount of subterfuge. Artifices work their glory. Since the 80s , it is the media that tout their " merits." When you see the state of the world , we understand that these " merits" ultra liberals, are usurped. Those 30 years of honoring foolish, have simply allowed them to repel the coming democratic. Further slow down a little the inevitable arrival of the beautiful and true democracy.
But life is stronger than the selfishness of the dominant. A selfishness that is in fact an instrument of evolution. The risk of global catastrophe is gradually taking the place of the virus to force a more humane leaders. These will add forces with the people to avoid the worst. Their blows brake will probably still numerous. They still try to maintain their privileges despite all risks. They still try , as they do today , to return to the old forms of domination. But the sense of humanity is drawn. It charts a course across all of our selfishness.
obviously, any justification for the existence of the virus to adopt a code of ethics. It should certainly not assert themselves through moral or moralistic sense of sin. Cholera , leprosy and AIDS , are not " evil " sent from God. They are not armed arm thrown against a particular group of people to punish them for their " sins." The virus is not used to punish man for his disobedience to obsolete dogmas today. It is not an evil identity , nor a weapon intractable and cruel god.
The virus involved in the life just like any other living form of the ecosystem. This work, like all of us , to the gradual rise to a superior mind. Like all life forms, it is linked to the great values which aspiring humanity. It is an indirect agent of fraternity , equality and love of others. An engine used by the universal consciousness to grow.
The pain is real , the virus forces us to develop our humanity... But is not this still the most common practice of man to evolve?
2001
Ce n'est pas une utopie. C'est une trajectoire déjà visible, inscrite dans l'histoire depuis le premier primate. Lentement. Imparfaitement. Mais dans une direction.
☀️ Découvrir le fondement